Lighting, distance, scale and the three shots that make a remote skin assessment work. From a GP who reads them daily.
Skin is one of the things remote consultations do genuinely well — provided the photographs are usable. A clear set of images can settle a diagnosis in minutes. A dark, blurred close-up taken at arm's length in a bathroom can make an experienced dermatologist useless.
The difference between the two is not equipment. Every modern phone camera is more than good enough. It is technique, and it takes about ninety seconds to get right.
Send three photographs of the same area, not fifteen of slightly different bits. Volume is not the same as information.
Taken from roughly a metre away, showing the whole body part — the entire forearm, the whole back, the full leg. This tells me where the problem is and how it is distributed, which is often more diagnostic than what an individual spot looks like.
Distribution is genuinely how skin diagnosis works. A rash on the extensor surfaces of the elbows and knees suggests something quite different from the same-looking rash in the creases. A rash that stops abruptly at a sock line suggests contact. One that follows a single band around one side of the trunk suggests shingles, and that changes the urgency entirely.
This is the shot most people skip, and it is the most useful one.
From about 20–30cm away, filling the frame with the affected area. This shows the individual lesions — whether they are flat or raised, blistered or scaly, uniform or varied.
Do not go closer than your phone can focus. Nearly every unusable close-up I receive is a photo taken from 5cm, where the camera has given up and focused on nothing at all. If the image looks soft on your screen, it is worse on mine.
The same close-up, with something of known size beside the lesion. A ruler if you have one; otherwise a coin, and tell me which. A 5p and a 2p are very different sizes, and "a coin" is not scale.
Size matters more than people expect — for moles especially, where the threshold for concern is often quoted at 6mm, and where a photograph without scale is genuinely uninterpretable.
Use daylight. Stand by a window, facing it, with the light falling on the area. Indirect daylight is close to ideal and free.
What to avoid:
If it is dark outside and cannot wait, use a second light source held to the side rather than the phone's own flash — another phone's torch works well and gives a texture that flash flattens.
Tap the screen on the lesion before you take the picture. Phones focus on whatever is in the middle by default, which is frequently not the thing you care about.
Brace your hand — against a wall, a table edge, your other arm. Slight blur is invisible on a phone screen and obvious on a laptop.
Where you can, put a plain background behind the area: a white towel or a plain sheet. Patterned bedding and busy backgrounds make it noticeably harder to judge colour.
A photograph tells me what the skin looks like now. It cannot tell me any of the following, and these often matter more:
Include the scale shot without exception, and if you have any older photograph of the same mole — even an incidental holiday snap — send it. Change over time is the most important single feature, and no single image can show it.
Hives in particular can disappear within hours. Photograph it when it is present, even if your appointment is days away. A patient arriving with photographs of a rash that has since gone is in a far stronger position than one describing it from memory.
Take one photograph straight on and one from each side. Facial conditions are often asymmetric, and asymmetry is informative.
Part the hair and hold it apart, and get someone else to take the photo. Self-taken scalp photographs are almost never usable.
These are legitimate medical photographs and we assess them routinely. Take them in the same way, upload them through the secure system rather than by email or text, and know that they are stored in your medical record under the same confidentiality as everything else.
I would rather say this plainly than have you pay for a consultation that cannot help.
Some things need to be seen and felt in person. A lesion needing dermoscopy, a lump needing palpation, or anything requiring a biopsy cannot be resolved by photograph, however good. In those cases my job is to recognise it quickly and get you referred, not to guess.
And some things need urgent care rather than a photograph at all. A rash that does not fade when pressed with a glass, particularly with fever or a headache; rapidly spreading redness with severe pain; blistering involving the mouth, eyes or genitals; or any rash with breathing difficulty or facial swelling. Those need 999 or A&E now, not an upload.
Skin problems are assessed in a standard dermatology consultation, with treatment and a prescription in the same appointment where appropriate.

Clinically reviewed by Dr Mohammad Zubair Khan, GMC 7563469
Last reviewed
August 23, 2026
Ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur commodo aliquam augue duis aliquet ipsum donec tempus ac interdum enim.